Thursday, March 12, 2026

Using Store Account Books to Find Our Ancestors


Overlooked Genealogy Records
Genealogists often search the obvious records first, i.e., census, land deeds, wills, military files, and church registers. But sometimes the richest clues to our ancestors’ lives appear in the most unexpected places. One such source is the store account book.

Recently, I came across a fascinating example from an ironworks community in Pennsylvania. 
At first glance, it might appear to be a simple transaction record. But a closer look reveals an entire community and the daily lives of the people who lived there.

Ironworks Community History in Early Pennsylvania
In 1810, Irish immigrant Roland Curtin established an iron forge along Bald Eagle Creek in Centre County, Pennsylvania. His enterprise, known as Eagle Iron Works, quickly grew into a large industrial community. The operation eventually included:
  • 30,000 acres of land
  • three blast furnaces
  • rolling, grist, and saw mills
  • a company store
  • worker housing
  • a school
  • homes for the Curtin family
Between 100 and 200 workers lived and labored in this iron plantation community. These workers filled many specialized roles:
  • miners extracting ore
  • colliers producing charcoal
  • Teamsters transporting materials
  • founders determining furnace mixtures
  • Iron masters tapping molten iron
  • drivers hauling timber and supplies, etc.
Industrial communities like this functioned almost like small towns built around a single employer.

A Research Goldmine for One-Place Studies

Records like this are especially powerful when studying a single community or workplace. By combining store ledgers, genealogists can reconstruct an entire social and economic network. 
A One-Place Study allows researchers to understand not just one ancestor, but the community that shaped their life. Using the following records, the community comes to life:
  • census records
  • tax lists
  • land deeds
  • church registers
  • payroll books
  • probate records
Where to Find Store Account Books
Many remain uncataloged or lightly indexed, making them especially valuable discoveries for genealogists willing to dig deeper. These genealogy store ledgers often survive in surprising places:
  • local historical societies
  • county archives
  • university manuscript collections
  • business archives
  • state libraries
  • museum collections connected to historic industries
They may appear under titles such as store ledgers, day-books, merchant account books, 
company store ledgers. 

Why Store Account Books Matter for Genealogy
Company store ledgers like this can reveal details rarely found elsewhere. 

They may show:
Occupations: Workers were often credited for specific tasks
Family clues: hint at family members not named in other records.
Economic status: Types of goods purchased can reflect income level.
Community connections: Multiple workers appear in the same ledger, reconstructing entire neighborhoods.
Ethnic diversity: Industrial sites often employed immigrants and free Black workers alongside others.

Other Overlooked Records Like Store Ledgers”

  • tavern licenses
  • apprenticeship indentures
  • tax lists
  • mill payroll books
  • church poor relief lists
Case Study:  Irish Immigrant and the Company Store
These humble account books remind us that genealogy is not just about names and dates. Even when other records barely acknowledge African American presence in the 1830s, in this case of Berry Cook, June 9, 1831,  identified in the record as a Black worker, is an entire story of labor, family, community, and survival in early industrial America. 


In 1810, Roland Curtin, an Irish immigrant, built an iron forge on Bald Eagle Creek in Centre County. Curtin expanded his "Eagle Iron Works" to include 30,000 acres of farm, ore, and forest land; three blast furnaces; rolling, grist, and saw mills; a store; a school; four "semi-mansions" for family members; and approximately seventy dwellings for his 100-200 full and part-time employees. His workers included, among others, drivers who transported wood to the wood-cutters; colliers who prepared the charcoal; miners who dug the ore; a founder who determined what amounts of ore and limestone (used as a flux to burn impurities from the ore) to put in the furnace; the iron master whose responsibility it was to tap the furnace of its molten iron at the proper time; and teamsters who carried the iron to markets east and west.

African Americans Named in Company Store Records
Although most of the ironworkers were of European ancestry, some were African Americans. As early as the 1770s, Blacks worked at the iron foundry at the Hopewell plantation in Berks County. By the 1830s, Roland Curtin employed at least a few at his Eagle Iron Works. It is not possible to determine exactly what they did, but it is unlikely that they held skilled positions here, or at any other iron plantation. The extant records do not reveal whether they lived in the company houses, but they might have resided there with the white workers and their families. What the records do indicate is that they frequented the company store. There, they purchased goods that they needed on credit, like the white workers. The document presented here is probably typical of the variety of goods bought at such a store. 

It shows, "Berry Cook, negro" bought in June and July of 1831, bacon and beef; fabrics such as calico, flannel, and muslin; stockings, combs, "1 pair Shoes for Wife," and other necessities. 

Even more valuable are the credits recorded in the account. As noted at the bottom of the document, Mr. Cook earned credit for his purchases, for example, $28.44 "By Making 8 ton 15¢ Blooms [a bar of iron for use by blacksmiths] @ 3.25 with Snowden", probably the man he assisted, and $3.00 for "6 days Mowing & Making Hay". $28.44 credited for making eight tons of iron blooms.

These entries suggest Berry Cook worked in iron production while also performing seasonal agricultural labor.

Entries for other workers whose ethnicity is not given, probably because they were white, show they made similar types of purchases, except for the forge manager. Presumably, his salary was higher, enabling him to buy more expensive goods, such as chocolate and molasses. 




Saturday, March 7, 2026

Research Irish Battalion:Mexican-American War

Men of the San Patricio Battalion

 Translation: "In memory of the Irish Soldiers of the heroic battalion of San Patricio Maritres that gave their life for the Mexican cause during the unjust North American invasion of 1847." (names) "With gratitude from Mexico to the 112 years of your sacrifice. Sept 1955

The Saint Patrick’s Battalion (San Patricios) was a group of 700+ mostly Irish immigrant soldiers who defected from the U.S. Army to fight for Mexico in the Mexican-American War (1846–1848). Driven by nativism, anti-Catholic sentiment, and better pay, they fought fiercely but were captured at the Battle of Churubusco; 50 were executed by hanging in September 1847, making it the largest mass execution in U.S. history. These men were hung in three different locations. The courts-martial were held in Mexico shortly after capture in Tacubaya and San Ángel and during the Battle of Chapultepec. The hangings were held from 10 - 13 Sep 1847

Seventy-two to eighty-five prisoners were court-martialed. Some were considered not-guilty. Fifty were hanged. Those executed below agree with the plaque above. are listed were to include those sentenced to death.

The 1847 court martial records can be found: 
  • National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) Office of the Judge Advocate General (Army), Record Group 153.
  • Be sure to check the Regular Army muster rolls for 1846–1847

Researchers can reconstruct the events from:

  • court-martial summaries
  • military orders
  • correspondence
  • newspaper accounts
  • Mexican archival sources
There are also records in the: 
  • Mexican archives (Archivo General de la Nación)
  • Published trial summaries in military histories
  • Chapultepec campaign records

Why This Post? Shameless Plug
a3Gen Publishing is readying the historical and genealogical research guidebook by Kathleen Brandt of TracingAncestors.org. Volume I, The Early Wars, is the first relief of Behind the Uniform: Every soldier has a story.

We have mentioned its upcoming release on the Hittin' the Bricks with Kathleen podcast. This guidebook covers not only how and where to research your ancestral veterans, but also facts proven using case studies and supporting documents. So much was missing from our History classes.

Volume I of Behind the Uniform: Every soldier has a story covers the French and Indian War to the Civil War (Union and Confederates).

Who were the Irishmen of the San Patricio Battalion?


These Irish ancestors deserted the U.S. Army in 1846 to fight on the Mexican side in the U.S. Mexican War (1846-1848). Where are the records go these Irishmen who deserted the American side to join and serve with their Mexican "Catholic brothers.""
A popular novel by Carl Kreuger, "Saint Patrick's Battalion" may also be of interest: 
Mexicans Became USA Citizens
Mexico had abolished slavery by 1829, and this war was viewed as an attempt by the U.S. to reintroduce slavery on "free" Mexican soil. It did succeed in expanding slave land by way of the annexation of Texas.
Brainerd Dispatch, 31 Jul 2018, pg. 6

Approximately 80,000 to 100,000 Mexican citizens (California and New Mexico) became "free persons" under U.S. law. This was not extended to enslaved American persons.



This War ushered in the Civil War.


Saturday, February 28, 2026

Pension Movement Suppressed: Records Preserved

 Ex-Slave Pension Mailbag Question
 "Is this accurate? Was the Ex-Slave Pension Movement considered a form of reparations?"

Answer:
This post could be called Beyond 1870: How the Ex-Slave Pension Movement Can Unlock Your Family History

Long before modern discussions of reparations, formerly enslaved Americans organized a national movement seeking federal pensions for unpaid labor under slavery. Through the National Ex-Slave Mutual Relief, Bounty and Pension Association, led by Callie House and Isaiah H. Dickerson,  thousands petitioned Congress for compensation. Their proposal, often called the “Freedmen’s Pension Bill,” sought pensions modeled after Civil War veteran benefits.

Today, historians widely regard this as the first large-scale reparations movement led by African Americans. Although it has been mistakenly claimed that the government proved fraud. In actuality, the federal government suppressed the movement, denied the pensions, and prosecuted its leaders.

Callie House did not give up. However, the organization eventually filed a class-action lawsuit in 1915 (Johnson v. McAdoo) seeking compensation from federal cotton tax revenues as reparations. This case is now recognized as the first documented Black federal reparations litigation

For the Genealogists
The Freedmen’s Pension Bill, Callie House, and the Bureau of Pensions Records name enslaved ancestors. The Ex-Slave Pension Movement (1890–1920) created valuable genealogical records in the National Archives RG 15 (M2110).

This association sought:

  • Federal pensions for formerly enslaved people

  • Modeled after Civil War Union veteran pensions

  • Compensation for unpaid labor under slavery

  • Relief for aging formerly enslaved individuals

The membership applications and correspondence sometimes include:

• Names of former enslavers
• Birth estimates before emancipation
• Plantation locations
• Family members
• Community affiliations

For descendants researching ancestors born before 1865, these files can provide rare late-life testimony from the formerly enslaved themselves.

These records survive in the National Archives (RG 15, Bureau of Pensions) and are partially digitized. For the curious historian, be sure to check out the following digitized correspondence: 

All Washington D.C., Pension Correspondence and Case Files of Formerly Enslaved People, 1892-1922 results for [Callie] House.

Black history is not just about suffering; it is also about organized advocacy, political strategy, and early justice movements.

What was the Freedmen’s Pension Bill?
The Freedmen’s Pension Bill was led by a Nebraskan white newspaper editor but was championed by the National Ex-Slave Mutual Relief, Bounty and Pension Association (MRB&PA). It is often referred to as "the first mass reparations movement led by African Americans. But it was not officially framed by Congress as “reparations” in legislative language. 

The goal was to obtain pensions for former slaves from the Federal government as compensation and reparations for unpaid labor and suffering. Congress never adopted it as a formal reparations policy. These records are held at the federal level in the “Bureau of Pensions, Records of the Department of Veterans Affairs.” 

Learn More: 

Be Historically Correct  

Kathleen Brandt
a3genealogy@gmail.com



Tuesday, February 17, 2026

The Quantum Leap of Genealogy Research Interest

The Quantum Leap of Genealogy, Genealogy Blood Quantum, and more
(Who's going to tell John, of Hittin' the Bricks with Kathleen genealogy podcast?)

Tuesday, January 27, 2026

3 Record Sets: Puerto Rican Enslaved Ancestors


Registro Central de Esclavos, 1872

Have You Researched Your Puerto Rican Enslaved Persons?

Did You Know?
Enslaved ancestors in Puerto Rico can be traced. 

Many genealogists are unaware that enslaved people in Puerto Rico can be traced by name using Spanish colonial records created in the years leading up to abolition. To begin this research, it is essential to understand three interconnected record sets, created at different stages of the abolition process.

Three Key Record Sets for Researching Enslaved People in Puerto Rico

1. Cédulas de esclavos
  •  Individual identity documents
  •  Issued before the abolition-era enumeration
  •  Often include physical descriptions, ownership, residence, and sometimes parentage
2. Empadronamiento General de Esclavos
  • Local enumeration of enslaved people
  • Conducted primarily circa 1871–1872, with earlier local enumerations (including 1867)
  • Organized by jurisdiction, plantation, or household
3. Registro Central de Esclavos (1872)
  • Centralized compilation of enumeration data
  • Used for emancipation administration and compensation
  • Captures enslaved people at the edge of freedom
These records are not redundant; they work together.

The Registro Central de Esclavos (1872)
For genealogists researching enslaved ancestors in Puerto Rico, the Registro Central de Esclavos (Central Registry of Slaves), created in 1872, is one of the most important, and most overlooked, record sets documenting slavery on the island just before slavery was abolition.

This registry was compiled one year before slavery was abolished in Puerto Rico, making it a rare snapshot of enslaved individuals, their owners, and family relationships at the very edge of freedom.

When Did Slavery End in Puerto Rico?
Slavery in Puerto Rico officially ended on March 22, 1873, when the Spanish Cortes passed the Abolition of Slavery Act for Puerto Rico.

However, emancipation was conditional:

  • Formerly enslaved people were required to work for their former enslavers for three additional years
  • Or purchase their freedom through a state-regulated compensation system
  • The system functioned more like indentured labor than true freedom

Important clarification:
The Moret Law (1870) did not abolish slavery outright. Instead, it granted limited freedom to:

  • Children born to enslaved mothers after 1868
  • Enslaved people over age 60
  • Enslaved people who served the Spanish state

True, unconditional emancipation, without forced labor or compensation, came only after these transitional requirements expired.

Why the 1872 Registry Matters
The Registro Central de Esclavos was created as part of Spain’s effort to inventory enslaved people before emancipation. It was used primarily to manage compensation claims by slaveholders.

For genealogists, this registry is invaluable because it may include:

  • Full name of the enslaved individual
  • Town or municipality
  • Place of birth (often Africa, the Caribbean, or Puerto Rico)
  • Name of the enslaver
  • Legal status
  • Age, sex, and physical description
  • Family relationships (parents, spouses, children)
  • Notations made as emancipation approached

In many cases, this may be the only surviving document that names an enslaved ancestor before freedom.

Locating These Records
Records of the Spanish Colonial Government of Puerto Rico, including the Registro Central de Esclavos (1872), are preserved as part of:

These records are held by the National Archives and Records Administration and are also accessible in part through FamilySearch.org, Puerto Rico Slave Registers, 1859–1880

Although Puerto Rico became a U.S. territory in 1898, Spanish-era records remained intact and were later incorporated into U.S. archival custody.

Note: These records are not fully digitized. Many are poorly indexed

Reading the 1872 Registry
The 1872 registry page shown above demonstrates the bureaucratic language of slavery:
  • Individuals are listed as property, yet paradoxically described in deeply human terms:
  • family, origin, and physical traits
  • Columns reflect ownership and legal control rather than personhood
  • Marginal notes may reveal changes in status as emancipation approached
This tension makes the registry both painful and powerful to work with.

The Registro Central de Esclavos (1872) is not just a list; it is a threshold document, capturing lives in the final moments before a legal transformation that was incomplete, conditional, and deeply unequal. For descendants, it can be the first moment an ancestor appears by name

Related Record Set: Empadronamiento General de Esclavos


Prior to the creation of the 1872 Registro Central de Esclavos (centralizaed registry), Spanish colonial authorities conducted a general enumeration of enslaved people known as the Empadronamiento General de Esclavos. This census-like record documented enslaved individuals by jurisdiction, plantation, and household. It often lists family relationships and physical descriptions.
Some surviving examples date to 1867, while others reflect the 1871–1872 enumeration phase immediately preceding abolition.

These census-like records often document enslaved individuals by:

  • Jurisdiction
  • Plantation or household
  • Family relationships
  • Physical descriptions
Why the New York Public Library Has These Records 
The New York Public Library collected Spanish colonial records as part of its global legal, colonial, and abolition-era documentation efforts, especially in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. 
This mirrors the record collections of:
  • Cuban slavery records in Boston
  • Brazilian manumission records in Paris
  • Haitian colonial records in Spain and France

Digitized examples of the Empadronamiento General de Esclavos (1867) are preserved in the NYPL collections and can provide critical pre-abolition context, particularly when used alongside the 1872 registry.

Puerto Rican descendants may also want to scour the NYPL Digital Collections, including holdings at the Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture, for registered slave records.

Case Example: Empadronamiento / Cédula Record
Slave Registry: Lucía, described as mulata and creciendo (still growing), was enslaved by Teodosio González, a resident of Utuado, Barrio de Caguana, Arecibo. Although her father is not named, her mother was Juana de Frecia. 

This type of individual record, whether a cédula or local empadronamiento entry, provides the personal detail that later feeds into the centralized 1872 registry.

Cédula Record

Why Genealogists Cédulas and the 1872 Registro Central de Esclavos?

These records work together.
  • Cédulas tell us who someone was
  • The 1872 Registro Central de Esclavos tells us where they stood when slavery ended
Together, they allow families to be traced across emancipation.

5 Research Pro Tips
Researching enslaved ancestors in Puerto Rico is complex but possible.
If you are researching Afro-Puerto Rican or enslaved ancestors:

  1. Search pre-1873 church records alongside the registry
  2. Track enslavers forward into 1873–1880 labor contracts
  3. Look for surname adoption patterns after emancipation
  4. Pair registry entries with Spanish civil records and municipal censuses
  5. Do not assume freedom in 1873 meant independence; many families remained tied to former owners for years

This research reminds us that emancipation was not a single date, but a long, contested process.

Wednesday, January 7, 2026

6 RESEARCH TIPS: FRENCH & INDIAN WAR

If you’ve hit a brick wall before 1776, this conversation is for you.
Before asking who your ancestor fought for, ask what shaped their life first. For many families, the answer lies in the French & Indian War.

The French & Indian War (1754–1763) shaped migration, land ownership, military experience, and family survival long before independence. Ignoring it can leave entire chapters of your ancestor’s life unexplored.


WHY THIS WAR MATTERS FOR GENEALOGISTS

This conflict occurred before the United States existed. As a result, it produced no federal pensions, no centralized service files, and no standardized documentation.

Those fragments explain:

  • sudden migrations into frontier regions

  • unexplained land ownership

  • gaps in tax, church, or court records

  • later Revolutionary War service

For genealogists, this war is not optional context; it is foundational.

COMMON MISCONCEPTIONS


“My ancestor wasn’t old enough.”
If your ancestor served in the Revolution, they were often shaped by this earlier war.

“There are no records.”
There are records, just not where most people look.

“It only involved soldiers.”
The war affected civilians, families, Native nations, and enslaved people alike.

6 RECORD SETS THAT CAN BE LOCATED:
Muster Rolls
1. Colonial Muster rolls
2. Payroll  (see below)
3. Council Records
4. Orderly books
5. Diaries, Officers
6. Pension Records, which may be found in Revolutionary records or local repositories


PLACES TO BEGIN WITHOUT BECOMING OVERWHELMED

You don’t need to become a military historian to research this war effectively. However, start by adjusting your expectations:

  • Look beyond traditional “military records”

  • Expand timelines backward

  • Read later records carefullyespecially pension narratives

  • Consider land and migration as consequences of service

Note: Recognize service when it isn’t labeled.

1. State Archives & Libraries (i.e. MA State Archives)
2. Library of Congress: Letters, George Washignton Papers, etc.
3. FamilySearch: keyword "French and Indian War" 
4.  Historical and Genealogical Societies: family genealogies, records and community compilations

The key is learning how to recognize service when it isn’t labeled.

AFRICAN AMERICANS  AND INDENTURED SERVANTS ALSO SERVED 

"Father or Master," Massachusetts

WHAT THIS MEANS FOR YOUR RESEARCH

The French & Indian War explains why many ancestors seem to appear “out of nowhere.”
It accounts for silence, movement, and transformation in colonial families.

Once you understand this war, Revolutionary War research becomes clearer, not harder.

This topic is explored further in the latest episode of Hittin' the Bricks with Kathleen, where we discuss:

  • why this war is overlooked

  • where evidence hides

  • how genealogists can reset expectations

Thursday, January 1, 2026

2026 Happy New Year

 

To our readers, listeners, donors, and sponsors, thank you for walking beside us. Every story shared, every brick removed, and every life honored happens because you believe history matters.
Here’s to another year of blogposts, voices, ancestors, and legacies remembered

If you've lost us be sure to subscribe and update the blog page for a3Genealogy. 

Note: We are now official partners with 
Tracing Ancestors (tracingancestors.org), a 501C3
Home of Hittin' the Bricks with Kathleen podcast